Fabergé and Breakfast at Tiffany’s
To many, the items produced by the
respective houses of Charles Louis Tiffany
and Peter Carl Fabergé are synonymous. And
while both businessmen developed organizations that in their days were
internationally recognized as producing the finest luxury items in the world,
it is interesting to note despite these differences that similar results were
achieved.
In many respects, Fabergé and Tiffany were a bookmatched pair. Fabergé, as has been described elsewhere in this work, was a trained jeweler by the time he took over his father’s established jewelry store in 1872 at the age of 24 as a sole proprietor. Tiffany, on the other hand, opened his store in 1837 at the age of 25 with a business background that involved his father’s cotton products factory and running his father’s country store. Tiffany’s business was created “from scratch”, financed with a loan from his father for $1,000 (about $20,000 today), and he was never in business by himself - from the day he opened he had at least one partner who contributed greatly to the success of the different aspects of the business and on whom he could rely during the difficult times. Fabergé had no such human cushion.
Both men were known for their
artistic sensibilities, although each displayed his refinement to a different
standard.
Especially
after the introduction of his brother Agathon to the firm in 1882, the House of
Fabergé was known for the classic, quietly elegant items it produced. Fabergé was know to place the overall effect
above materials themselves – sometimes less than perfect stones might be used,
for example, so that their matching colors would provide an overall unity to
the piece. Tiffany, on the other hand,
was proud of the fact that his artists designed using only the highest quality
stones and other material. Fabergé
thought little of this approach. In a
1914 article in Town and Country he expressed his distaste for the work of
his competitors: “Clearly if you
compare my things with those of such firms as Tiffany, Boucheron and Cartier,
of course you will find that the value of theirs is greater than of mine. As far as they are concerned, it is possible
to find a necklace in stock for one and a half million
rubles.
But of course these people are merchants and not artist-jewelers. Expensive things interest me little if the
value is merely in so many diamonds or pearls”.
It might surprise the reader to know that Tiffany
& Co. didn’t start out as a jeweler, and as a matter of fact didn’t sell
jewelry of any kind for several years after it was established. It opened as
a stationary and “fancy goods” shop and sold Chinese pottery, Japanese
laquerwork, cabinets and other bric-a-brac in a converted townhouse in the
low-rent district where the showroom was in what used to be the living room of
the house. Tiffany & Young,
(Tiffany’s original partner was his life-long friend John B. Young) as the
store was originally called, had no
established
clientele from which to draw, and the receipts showed it. The first day’s take was only $4.98 ($98.92
today), but thru the owners’ careful selection of merchandise and its artful
display the customers came back, and on New Year’s Eve of that year, the store
brought in $675 ($13,408.78). It was with the introduction of
another partner that the store was to begin down the path for which it has
become world famous. In 1841, J. L
Ellis joined the firm, and during his buying trips to Europe he discovered,
according to William O. Stoddard in his 1893 monograph Men of Achievement,
Men of Business, “…better grades of cheap jewelry than were previously
known upon this side of the Atlantic”.
There were similarities between Tiffany and Fabergé, too. As we’ve discussed elsewhere, Fabergé is known to have not created any of the
exquisite items that were produced by his firm. His talent lie in his ability to design and to recognize and
direct the talents of others. The same
could be said of Tiffany. Although not
a trained jeweler, as we’ve said, Tiffany had a discriminating eye and
surrounded himself with artisans who were capable of turning out products for
which Tiffany’s would become justly renowned. Stoddard noted that, at Tiffany’s
“…the united operations were controlled by the art purpose of the directing artist,
who was not himself a handicraftsman of any kind”. Tiffany was known to be “…liberal in its judicious
hunt for and employment of workmen”. Tiffany
started producing gold jewelry in 1847, and in 1851 began to manufacture
sterling silverware. The little shop
grew until “the workmen numbered five hundred”, or about the same size as Fabergé’s.
Both firms were well represented in
international expositions in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Tiffany exhibited at the Paris Expositions of
1867, 1878, 1889 & 1900, the Centennial Exhibition of 1876 in Philadelphia,
the World’s
Columbian Exposition of 1893 in Chicago, The Pan-American Exposition of
1901 in Buffalo, and the Louisiana Purchase Exposition in 1904 in St.
Louis. Not only did the store win
several awards over the years, but the exposure brought the attention of many
of the crowned heads of Europe, who were to patronize the stores over the
years. Tiffany was appointed jeweler to the monarchs of England, Spain,
Romania, Russia and several others.
Similarly, Fabergé,
having been appointed Supplier to the Imperial Court (of Russia) after he
exhibited at a Moscow exhibition in 1882, was soon to become familiar to most
of the royal houses of Europe. None of this would have been possible, as both
would
acknowledge, without the association of some
of the world’s finest designers and craftspeople.
It is not known if Fabergé
became involved in civic and patriotic causes, but Tiffany did. He was one of
the founders of the Union League Club during the Civil War that supported the
policies of Abraham Lincoln. He was one
of the founders of the New York Society of fine Arts, a trustee of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art and of the American Museum of Natural history. He was a fellow of the National Academy and
of the Geographic Society.
Tiffany’s hasn’t been owned by the
Tiffany family since 1955, but the store continues in the tradition began by
Tiffany and Young nearly two centuries ago. Perhaps Holly Golightly best
expressed the sentiments of many in the 1961 classic film Breakfast at Tiffany’s “Well, when I get it (the blues)
the only thing that does any good is to jump in a cab and go to Tiffany’s”.